Sunday, July 16, 2023

Astrology...Wheels within Wheels

Astrology...Wheels within Wheels

Interplanetary Cycles


Each and every planet works with each and every other planet, interweaving energy to create time and the possibilities inherent in it. The planets do this by moving through a cycle of relationship with each other – one fast and one slow – the stages of these cycles being called aspects. Aspects are recognised angles between planets, forming sequences in a cyclical order.

Here we are looking at cycles, so-called synodic cycles, and some groundwork on aspects, before going into a full outline of the shape of a cycle in chapter 8. This and the next chapter are a bit dense and complex: return to them again after some time has elapsed, and allow yourself on first reading simply to get a picture of the whole issue of aspects.

Cycles

When we were looking at the zodiac in chapter 4, we were looking at a zodiacal cycle, in which a planet moves in relation to a fixed frame of reference, the zodiac. The zodiac filters planetary energy to bring to us underlying themes, viewpoints, atmospheres, possible scenarios and feeling-tones, distinguishing chapters in the story of each planet's journey round the zodiac. But planetary motions through signs do not necessarily create the energy changes which have the power to set in motion events and distinct breakthroughs: aspects do this.

Aspects are part of a synodic cycle, in which, like the hour and minute hand of a clock, two planets move in a cycle of dynamic relationship with each other. This cycle begins when the planets conjunct () – they are located in the same place in the zodiac (as when clock hands are at 12.00, 1.05, 2.10, 3.15 etc). It comes to a climax when the planets are in opposition () to one another (as when clock hands are at 6.00, 7.05, 3.10, 9.15 etc). Other stages mark different points along the way.

Successive conjunctions take place in different signs. While the faster of any two planets might fulfil its zodiacal cycle in a certain time (for example, Mars in one year and ten months), it might take some time for it to catch up again with the slower planet, which by this time has moved along at its own rate (for example conjunctions between Mars and Jupiter take place roughly every two years and two months. In the 1980s and 90s, for example, successive conjunctions of Mars and Jupiter took place at 15(Pisces, Dec 86), 0(Gemini, March 89), 11(Leo, June 91), 15(Libra, Sept 93), 18(Sagittarius, Nov 95) and 24(Aquarius, Jan 98), about six times in a zodiacal Jupiter cycle of 12 years. In the case of the Moon, the zodiacal lunar cycle is 27 days 7 hours long, while her synodic cycle is 29 days 12 hours, on average – there is a time-difference between a zodiacal and a synodic cycle.

The Mars-Jupiter cycle relates to tides of assertiveness, sexuality, initiative, outbreak and power-assertion in society and the group psyche, which is a very different business to that of the lunation cycle. The synodic cycle of Mars to Pluto takes place a little quicker, even though it is a Mars cycle, because Pluto moves slower than Jupiter, and thus successive Mars-Pluto conjunctions will take place in only just a little more than a zodiacal cycle. In the above time-period, 1986-98, Pluto will have covered but one sign, while Jupiter will have moved through the whole zodiac. The Mars-Pluto cycle relates to a deeper source of assertiveness which brings the death and transformation of the old and the forcing forward of the inevitably-new. The Jupiter-Pluto synodic cycle, in turn, lasts around 13 years – this relates to longer-term bursts of progress, breakthrough, inevitability and force, evolving in 3, 6-7 and 13 year jumps.

In astrology we have a wide range of cycles to play with, ranging from 29 days (Moon-Sun) to around 490 years (Neptune to Pluto). Lots of scope! More within our own personal reach, Sun/Mercury/Venus to Mars cycles last around 2.4 years, Mars cycles to slower planets last just over 2 years, Jupiter-Saturn cycles last 20 years, Jupiter-Uranus cycles 14 years, Jupiter-Pluto cycles 13 years, Saturn-Uranus cycles 45 years, Saturn-Pluto cycles 35 years, and so on.

Transits involving Chiron and Pluto can be extremely variable over time, since each of these orbits so eccentrically that it is difficult to generalise on lengths of cycles. We're thus playing around with a whole range of interlocking and quirky cycles, which give a lot of scope for ongoing wading-sessions in your ephemeris!

It can be mind-boggling to our thinking mind (left brain) and illuminating to our visionary mind (right brain) to visualise all this interrelated movement going on. There's a beauty to it which at least equals that of watching ocean waves! Give some time to developing this vision, for it is vital.

You can do this several ways on a practical level:

  • keep a constant eye on your ephemeris for a year, and form regular pictures of the distribution of the planets round the zodiac, and what they are doing to one another;
  • the more technically inclined can draw or follow graphs of planetary motions (of which there are examples in the book) by sketching in the motions of the planets for a few months or a year on some graph paper;
  • or you can draw yourself a big circle (or paint a zodiac mandala) to stick up on the wall, then, using mapping pins, you can move the pins round daily or periodically for, say, a year, reading positions from your ephemeris – you could even go mad and build a mandala on the ground, using log stumps or stones for the planets; do whatever stimulates you most!
  • following transits, which we look at later in the book, is another way of moving into relationship with planetary motions.

Hemicycles

hemicycle is a half-cycle. We can look at a complete cycle in terms of two different kinds of hemicycle.

Waxing and waning hemicyclesThe waxing-waning hemicycle is interesting because it illustrates the developmental, evolutionary and integrative side of cycles. The waxing hemicycle starts at the conjunction and ends at the opposition. During this time the faster planet is moving away from the slower one: this is a process in time where new potentials are explored, where dreams and intentions emerge from in-here to out-there, in an evolutionary motion. The waning hemicycle starts at the opposition and ends at the conjunction. Here, the faster planet is now catching up with the slower: this is a process in which the externalised identity consolidated at the opposition seeks and fulfils a context in the overall scheme of things, in an integrative motion. Consider the growth of an annual plant: it first grows and takes shape, rising to flowering, to declare its own selfhood, then it gives forth its pollen or seeds, and eventually its very leaves or even its stalk wither, dry and drop, to feed future cycles of growth.

Subjective-Objective HemicyclesThe subjective-objective hemicycle illustrates the various facets of two contrasting states of being or awareness-reality. Subjectivity is a me-in-here standpoint, in which personal aims, plans, ways of interpreting life and defining self prevail. The subjective hemicycle has its focus at the conjunction, but spreads out either side to two points halfway toward the opposition, called the square () aspects. Objectivity is a me-in-relation-to-all-that, or me-as-a-part-of-that, standpoint. The objective hemicycle peaks at the opposition and itself spreads out to the squares. Thus, between the waning square and the conjunction, we find out who we are through filling our created role in the world, while between the conjunction and the waxing square we explore our own terms of reference: and both processes reveal different aspects of selfhood. While between the waxing square and the opposition, we meet the world and its specifications, and between the opposition and the waning square we explore our membership in the world and society.

Combining these two hemicycles, we can define four quarters to a cycle. From conjunction we are 'doing our own thing', from waxing square we are encountering the world and entering into rapport with it, from the opposition we become a part of everything, and from the waning square we rediscover ourselves through fulfilling and finding personal meaning from our involvement and roles.

Aspects

Aspects are recognised angles of relationship between any two planets where we can identify certain describable kinds of energy-interchange between them. They are stages on the journey of relationship around a whole cycle.

A cycle starts with a conjunction () and then moves through various stages:

semisextile at 30°,
semisquare at 45°,
sextile at 60°,
square at 90°,
trine at 120°,
sesquiquadrate at 135° (90°+45°),
quincunx at 150° (called inconjunct in America) and
opposition at 180°.

The general principle behind the aspects is a subdivision of the cycle of 360° by a number such as 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 or 12. In advanced astrology, all sorts of numbers can be used, yielding sometimes quite weird angles (such as 51°25', 1/7 of the circle), but we'll leave these out here. Here we shall look at the above-named aspects, the most important ones.

Four aspect quadrantsA cycle has within it four main stages: childhood/beginning, youth/development, maturity/application and old age/completion. Gestation of the new takes place within the completion stage, for, as the Chinese were wont to point out, an end is only the prelude to a new beginning. This is another way of looking at the fourfold subdivision of the cycle mentioned above. The transition-points between these four stages (conjunction, two squares and the opposition) are vital humps to cross, and when they involve slower cycles, they are points of initiation: an initiation takes place when, if willing or if pushed, we face up to truths about our life and situation and we go through a squeeze or a crunch, fundamentally changing our way of being and our way of working with life, becoming a new person.

These initiations can be very major ones when slow-moving planets are involved, for the test can be drawn out over a longer time, such as a year or up to three, and it can involve major, core life-questions. Lesser initiations punctuate our lives too, such as when Moon periodically brings up a crunchy situation lasting one evening, which, while brief, can still give us a goodly shake and wobble. These small and punchy crunches and scrapes can often serve as critical points in larger initiations, for often the greatest of changes can focus and go critical on something on one evening or in one night-time dream, even though the whole process might be going on over years.

Challenges and developments

Aspects are spread out throughout a cycle in a regular fashion – at least, the major ones which we shall look at here are so – at intervals of either 30° or 45°. A glance at the diagram will illustrate this. Each of the aspects has a symbol in astrological shorthand, and when we mention two planets in aspect to one another, we say, for example, 'Moon sextile Jupiter' (). The faster planet, doing the aspecting, comes first, then the aspect, then the slower planet which is being aspected. Note these examples: Sun trine Saturn (), Mars quincunx Uranus (), but then... Moon trine Sun (), Sun opposition Mars (), Saturn semisquare Uranus (). The whole sequence of aspects follows in the next chapter.

Octile family of aspects
Octile aspects

The fundamental aspects (and) mark the beginnings and climaxes of cycles, and have major implications relating to the overall meaning of each and every cycle; the challenging aspects (,and) represent something which must be climbed over, worked at, broken through, confronted, decided upon or released; the flowing aspects (and) represent an opening and widening out, a relaxing, an evolution and a development; the incidental aspects [my term] (and) introduce new elements into the game, incursions from the unknown, which change our experience of things. Each of these kinds of aspect plays its part in the pattern of a cycle, and their sequence is significant.

The sextile family of aspects
The Sextile family

It all very much depends on how we deal with things. Challenging aspects are very positive if we are willing and ready to work at things, for they encourage us to do just that, while flowing aspects can imply a feeling of stuckness and inability to motivate a change if we are inactive or lazy. Our experience of each cycle is greatly influenced by the way we are using our lives: sometimes it can be very beneficial to be ill, and other times it can be very difficult winning a million!

Where it stops, nobody knows

Cycles do not exist separately from one another: they lead on to and from each other, and serve as each other's past and future. Often it is the case that issues dealt with in one cycle go under and reappear in a much later cycle, which then thematically feeds back not only to the immediately preceding cycle, but also to earlier cycles. Also, cycles exist within larger cycles. This becomes an adventure in perspective! At the times when we are able to stand back from life, digest and look at things, we come into contact with the larger cycles at work in our lives. The life process moves ever onward, and these pauses in its somewhat relentless movement act as timeless breaks in a never-ending process of historic unfoldment.

As you come to understand the pattern in a cycle of aspects, you'll notice that there is a distinctly coherent undulation to it which makes a lot of sense. The Grand Design has it that we go through digestible variations in experience, including sufficient challenges to keep us on our spiritual toes and sufficient relaxations to allow us to be at ease with life. Some aspects are fundamental, some challenging, some flowing and others incidental; thus life presents us with a series of time-processes which are very well designed!

Astrology is a relatively sane way of grasping the ungraspable, reaching into the unknowable. Whilst we can give a description and impression of the form of a cycle, as we are about to do, it is, to be truthful, not as easy as this to limit things to a nice but rigid definition. When using astrology, we are bordering into the realm of the Unknown, of riddle and paradox! Thus, if you watch what happens during a succession of fullmoons, you will notice that they are both similar to each other and extremely different. That is, the underlying pattern is there, since all fullmoons are soli-lunar oppositions, and they have a definite undertow to them which can be recognisable even if you don't have your ephemeris around. But the precise flavour of each fullmoon can be quite variable. In other words, use this book, and any other, as a catalyst to help you attune to what we're talking about, but form your own conclusions, from your own experience! For this is the only way to a truer knowing.

Orbs

While each aspect is a specific angle (like 30°, 60°, 90°), it represents a stage, a milepost in the unfoldment of a cycle. But like mileposts along a road, they represent but markers along the cycle to show us where we are: in fact, a cycle is a continuum. Each aspect has a field of influence around it, where it can be said to be having an effect – this is called an orb. Just as any event has a buildup, a specific time of occurrence, then an aftermath, so it is with aspects.

Orbs vary in wideness, according to the nature of the aspect. There is debate amongst astrologers as to how wide we should have orbs. One discrepancy in this debate is that many astrologers seek a definite orb, a degree where the aspect markedly starts or finishes. This is not lifelike, for energy unfolds gradually, just as the colours of the rainbow phase into one another gradually, and they cannot have clear lines of demarcation. So in this book, the values given for orbs are twofold: the smaller orb denotes the area where a definite effect from an aspect can be detected, while the larger one denotes the area where rumblings are felt which might not at the time be noticeable, although in retrospect or under subtler scrutiny, they can be recognised. An example is the pre-fullmoon period, which can be felt for two days (up to one sign, 30°) before the exact fullmoon.

To complicate matters, orbs are widened or narrowed according to the planets involved. Generally, orbs are widened when Sun and Moon are involved in any aspect, and narrowed for slower planets. Suggested orbs for both aspects and planets are summarised on the symbol page at the beginning of the book. When assessing an aspect, therefore, use your judgement or preference as to the width of the orb, and if in doubt, consult your own experience and make your own decisions as you progress!

Application and separation

These are astrologese for aspects which are forming (the faster planet is moving into aspect with the slower) or moving apart (the faster is leaving its aspect with the slower).

As an aspect is applying, the two planetary energies are juddering against one another, seeking to form a relationship, to come into gear: this can mean some friction, jarring, jangle and difficulty until the aspect is formed. In addition, we tend to throw into the bargain our own resistances and anticipations, which heighten this grating. A lot of the spadework is done during the buildup to aspects: people who resist growth and change exert much energy stop it happening, and people who accept it go through some resistances but yield to change as the aspect nears exaction, while people who seek to induce change often go through hell some time before it, only to land up thriving on it all when the aspect is close to exactness. Resistance tends to give way to acceptance around 1-2° before the planets have formed an exact aspect. For some an aspect can be very fear-inducing, stimulating resistance-at-all-costs, since change is seen as a threat to security; at best, such people might loosen up after the pressure dies down when the aspect is separating, and at worst (not uncommon) no movement is made at all, heels are dug further in, and misfortune, illnesses and unhappiness set in sooner or later.

Aspect energies come into their own around exaction, and an alchemical reaction takes place, bringing about change, transition or movement. Once this is done the aspect starts separating, and a process of digestion and assimilation follows, in which the dust settles, and the new state is integrated, normalised and utilised. As the aspect separates, what was once future and potential becomes past and established. At times the integration process can take some time, especially if concrete life-forms need changing (like a move of house or a marital separation), or if there has been considerable shock, confusion or disarray around the time of the aspect. Usually things become clear and established when the aspect is around 2-3° separating.

Retrograde waltzes

RetrogradesThree passes of a Jupiter conjunct Uranus in Sagittarius in 1983. Note also the Jupiter opposition Chiron – Jupiter got caught up in a gradually-applying Chiron opposition Uranus which became exact in 1986.

Particularly when the slower planets are aspecting one another, two of them can move into aspect, then one or both can turn retrograde, move out of aspect, then back in again. This makes for a three-step process in which changes are strung out over a period, made into a lengthy process. The first formation of the aspect then becomes a news-bringer, in which we move into an awareness that a change is needed or pending or desirable: it ends the old situation, but inaugurates a limbo or transitional period. At the retrograde, second aspect, there can be a feeling that things are literally going backwards, and a struggle or energy-droop can ensue wherein, semiconsciously, the resolve to make the change is really generated. The change, the beginning of the future state, takes place when the third, direct pass of the transit takes place.

Occasionally, with Neptune and Pluto, this can take place more than three times: Neptune and Pluto have been in an ongoing sextile aspect to one another, passing into and out of aspect many times over the last few decades, since Pluto, at its fastest speed in the late 20th Century, keeps pace with Neptune, even though its overall cycle is much longer. This has been an important historical aspect, bringing about an ongoing emergence of new ideas, developments and innovations over a long term, with through the 1950s, 60s, 70s and 80s. Pluto is pulling away from the sextile in the early 21st Century.

Following cycles

Shorter-term cycles are not too difficult to follow – lunations and annual cycles don't involve too much waiting. It is worth observing them as they are happening, and in advance and in retrospect also. This means keeping your ephemeris with you (Raphael's is best for this) and keeping a regular watch on the motions of the planets, checking what you see in the ephemeris with what you experience in your life and around you in the lives of other people, nature, the weather, the cat or whatever interests you. It's a matter of learning to tune in to the collective psyche, and the underlying tendencies in nature and the world.

Longer-term cycles are different. It starts getting really interesting if you have been studying planetary movements for a decade or more, but it isn't very encouraging to be admonished to wait so long! There are escape routes: if you come across a slower aspect (for example, Jupiter square Saturn in 1986, Saturn conjunct Uranus in 1988, Jupiter square Chiron/Uranus plus Chiron opposition Uranus in 1986-7) it is possible to look back through your ephemeris (the American Ephemeris is best for this one) at previous dates when earlier aspects in the cycle in question took place. In this way, the significance of the current aspect can be seen more clearly in comparison with pastcases. Look back over the past (at some time when you are feeling recollective) at its longer term cycles, and see what you can make of them by comparing their timing with things that happened. Later in the book we shall look at ways in which you can look back over your whole life, at its own cycles, breakthroughs, turning-points and flowerings, using transits. If looking at historical cycles excites you, visit the Historical Ephemeris website.

Cogs in the cosmic machinery

Different interplanetary cycles bear different levels of significance and effect. The general rule is: the slower a cycle or the planets making it, the more fundamental and deep it is in effect. Even though a fullmoon can, at the time, feel as if it is the end of the world or a major soulquake, fullmoons come and go. They can play a part in a larger energy-process, if they connect aspectwise with any slower planets involved, and they can sometimes make for significant cruxpoints and crunches which bring longer-term, deeper issues to the surface – for example, the Chemobyl nuclear reactor blew its top on a fullmoon close to conjunction with Pluto, playing a dramatically specific part in a longer-term Pluto-in-Scorpio unfoldment lasting from 1984-96.

The Uranus-Pluto aspect cycle is a very different thing from, say, the Venus-Mars cycle. It's necessary to sort out therefore what the different levels of cycles are, so that you can form an idea of the significance of a specific aspect or cycle you might be observing:

  • cycles between outer planets have historical significance affecting centuries and generations, involving the surfacing of new thought-forms, realities and possibilities in the collective psyche, in history and the lives of nations and the world;
  • cycles between Jupiter or Saturn and the outer planets have historical significance in terms of decades, particularly affecting the way deeper thought-forms are materialised, and institutional and social changes are wrought – these two interlace the deepest issues with more year-by-year world issues;
  • Jupiter-Saturn cycles involve practicalities, organisational realities and concrete social issues, with turning-points every 5-6 years, and new cycles starting every 20 years (often featured by assassination attempts on US Presidents!);
  • Sun-Mercury-Venus-Mars cycles to outer planets repeat once every 1-3 years, featuring the surfacing of deeper issues (outer planets) in more fleeting yet discernible terms in interpersonal issues and atmospheres – aspects last 1-3 weeks in their effects;
  • Sun-Mercury-Venus-Mars aspects to Jupiter and Saturn act similarly, focused on personality-level issues – these cycles are somewhat longer than those just above, because Jupiter and Saturn move faster than the outer planets, requiring more chasing by Mercury, Venus or Mars;
  • mutual cycles between Sun, Mercury, Venus and Mars last only months or up to 3 years, evoking feeling-tones, motions of energy, shorter-term changes and conditions which feel significant at the time, but which melt into lost detail in a longer-term perspective;
  • cycles between Moon and any other planet last but a month, yet major aspects between them can bring about occasionally powerful yet brief (1-2 days) atmospheres, situations and occasions, and can be well worth noting.

This diagram shows the way that aspects between the Sun and any planet outside Earth's orbit actually look from an astronomical viewpoint. Earth itself moves, at its own speed, as well as the outer planet – this simplified diagram doesn't show Earth's own movement.

It's a matter of choice as to how to focus your interest; some people look into immediate, shorter-term cycles (especially because they are experientially quite definite and concise), while others are interested in longer-term flows and the broader issues arising in connection with them. Of course, isolating individual cycles is not possible, for everything takes place in the context of everything else, but an awareness of the different levels of cycles at work helps sort out what energy is what when you're in the middle of a life-situation and trying to make sense of it. Periodically, all sorts of multiple interactions or sequences of astrological events take place, forming interestingly different patterns, atmospheres and trains of experience. Keep your astrological eyes peeled, your nose to the wind and your ephemeris within easy reach!

Panegyrations

Imaging up a picture of the whole living, breathing motion of the solar system can be a boggling experiment. But it is possible. If you first get a sense of the periodicities of the planets and their order from the Sun, you can then image the whole system in its parts. Take the Sun first, and develop a good picture/experience of it as a star and a being; then image Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Chiron swinging eccentrically, Uranus, Neptune and Pluto individually, taking your attention off the previous planet yet maintaining a sense of a presence of it still there, moving on its course.

The planets orbit anti-clockwise when seen from 'above' the solar system. When you have reached Pluto, widen your perspective, and re-image planets, moving back in toward the Sun, including them one by one into the whole scenario. If you lose the image, you can reclaim it by persevering with re-imaging planets, taking them in one by one, until a whole sense of the solar system takes shape. It is possible to allow the planets to dissolve into light, and note their colours/feelings, then to take this light into yourself, such that it fills your body. Stay with the state you have developed, and rest in it, before surfacing.

The solar system is a living, breathing being, with an incredible beauty to its manner of moving. This imaging is easier to do than what is necessary in order to be able to see how the planets look from Earth! In days of old, an astrologer would serve a training of many years in order, amongst other things, to develop a living, moving picture of the motions of all cycles and movements we look at in astrology. S/he would spend many nights for years and years observing the stars, planets and Moon, and the rising and setting of the Sun. Gaining a full inner grasp of the movement of the solar system stimulates a genuine spiritual experience. Try it!

Astrological symbols
------------------------------------------
Source

http://www.palden.co.uk/living/lit07-interplanetarycycles.html

Thursday, July 6, 2023

Book Review: The Sermon on the Mount

Book Review: The Sermon on the Mount

Book Review: The Sermon on the Mount

Sermon on the Mount book review, Emmet Fox book review

This month I have enjoyed rereading this classic book by Emmet Fox with a book group at the Congregational church. The content of this material is so close to Christian Science that the minister there, whom I know from my interfaith work in Ridgefield, invited me to join them. I was so glad she did!

It has been years since I have read this book, and I give it an enthusiastic five stars. Earlier this month, I quoted Emmet Fox in this post. Even if you have read this book before, I suggest you reread it as well, and if you have never read it, I encourage you to do so!

Rather than quote the whole book, I’ll share here two choice bits:

  • “The plain fact is that it is the Law of Life that, as we think, and speak, and act toward others, so will others think, and speak, and act toward us. Whatever sort of conduct we give out, that we are inevitably bound to get back. Anything and everything that we do to others will sooner or later be done to us by someone, somewhere. The good that we do to others we shall receive back in like measure; and the evil that we do to others in like manner we shall receive back too. This does not in the least mean that the same people whom we treat well or ill will be the actual ones to return the action. That almost never happens; but what does happen is that at some other time or place, often far away and long afterwards, someone’s who knows nothing whatever of the previous action will, nevertheless, repay it, grain for grain, to us. For every unkind work you speak to or about another person, an unkind word shall be spoken to or about you. For every time you cheat, you will be cheated. For every time you deceive you will be deceived. For every lie you utter, you will be lied to. Everytime you neglect a duty, or evade a responsibility, or misuse authority over other people, you are doing something for which you will inevitably have to pay by suffering a like injury yourself. ‘With what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.’ Now, is it not obvious that if only people realized all this being literally true, it would have the profoundest influence on their conduct? Would not such an understanding do more to decrease crime and raise the general moral standard of the community than all the laws ever passed by parliaments, or all the formal punishments meted out by judges and magistrates?”
  • “In the Bible the term ‘Christ’ is not identical with Jesus, the individual. It is a technical term which may be briefly defined as the Absolute Spiritual Truth about anything. Now to know this Truth about any person, or condition, or circumstance, immediately heals that person, or condition, or circumstance, to the extent that such Truth is realized by the thinker. This is the essence of spiritual healing, and thus we see that in the widest sense, and altogether independently of the special and unparalleled work that was done by Jesus himself, it is true that the Christ comes into the world to redeem it and save it.”

For a refreshing look at the basic teachings of Christianity, I highly recommend this book. It gently makes me want to be a better person, which is always a worthy result. If more people read this book and followed its advice, the world would be a dramatically better place.

----------------------------------------------

Polly Castor

I work to amplify good wherever I find it. I love color, texture, beauty, great ideas, nature, metaphor, deliciousness, genuine spirituality, and exploring new territory. I encourage authenticity, nurture creativity, champion sustainability, promote peace, and hope to foster a new renaissance where we all are free to be our most fulfilled, multifaceted, and terrific selves

----------------------------------------------

Source

https://pollycastor.com/2016/07/29/book-review-the-sermon-on-the-mount/

Sunday, July 2, 2023

The Psychology of Projection

The Psychology of Projection

Projection is a psychological fact that can be observed everywhere in the everyday life of human beings, whether you are having a conversation and someone tells you that you are projecting, or the first impressions you have of a particular person that turned out to be wrong.

In our ideas of other people and situations, we are often liable to make misjudgements that we later have to correct, having acquired better insight. In such cases, most people acknowledge their mistake and let the matter drop, without bothering to ask themselves where the false judgement or the incorrect idea came from.

However, to really know who we are, we must concern ourselves with correcting such misjudgements. Many people will cling to them with every fibre of their being, because if one accepts correction, one may fall into a depression.

Psychological projection was conceptualised by Sigmund Freud, the father of psychoanalysis, as an unconscious mechanism where one ascribes one’s own motivations, thoughts, feelings, and desires that are unacceptable to oneself, while attributing them to others. It is a misalignment of the inner and outer world, because what one is inwardly, one will see outwardly.

When we experience betrayal, abuse, discomfort, etc., we might very well be distrustful of others. This is a defence mechanism, a projection from one’s psychological history.

When we find certain unacceptable feelings, thoughts or behaviours in ourselves that we refuse to acknowledge, and see someone with that specific trait, we will feel resentment, hatred and anger towards them. Projection occurs not because of what other people say to you, but rather because of what you yourself think about those people.

A person with a strong “self-concept” (the knowledge of who one is) makes one feel good about who they are. Negative projection is more likely to occur in people with a low self-image and low self-esteem. The real self that always tends towards an ideal self, turns into a despised self.

Example of Projection

Focal Point – Leon Zernitsky

For example, a man is afraid to voice his opinion in important matters related to his job, because he does not like conflicts, he is too shy, insecure and prefers to remain passive and just do his work quietly. His co-worker, however, is assertive and makes his opinions heard in every meeting, though the shy person believes he has much better opinions. This results overtime in his co-worker getting a promotion and a raise.

Once he returns home, he will feel hatred against himself, and project it onto his co-worker, who has the qualities that he wants to possess. By pointing our finger to other people, we help to reduce the discomfort, anxiety or bad feelings about ourselves, and avoid taking responsibility to implement these good qualities in ourselves, because it is too painful, difficult or uncomfortable. When you point one finger, there are three fingers pointing back at you.

In this way, we deny that the bad qualities are ours and attribute them to others. We judge, attack or blame them. This can be extended to whole groups of people with specific ideas. One who lives through projection is convinced that it is others who have all the bad qualities and who practise all the vices. Therefore, it is they who are wrong and they who must be fought against. When one thinks everything is someone else’s fault, one will suffer a lot.

Projection occurs on an unconscious level, it is unperceived and unintentional. Projections are like an icicle, they return to us, we do not remain unpunished when we project. However, we must bear in mind that we do not make projections, rather they happen to us. It is easier to see someone else projecting than seeing yourself as projecting. They are unconscious in nature, and in the moment that you are conscious of projecting, you are already out of its influence.

To make the unconscious contents conscious, which includes the withdrawal of projections, represents an important psychological task, that allows for an increase in consciousness, and an advance in self-realisation.

It is not unusual to justify one’s projection by inventing a rationale. For instance, the person caught buying on the “black market” says in self-justification, “everybody else is doing it.” Here, the attempt is to convert neurotic anxiety about doing something wrong into objective anxiety about not getting enough to eat.

Jungian analyst Marie-Louise von Franz writes:

“If a son, for example, experiences his father as tyrannical, in later life he will, in many cases, not only project the quality of tyranny onto authority figures and father figures, such as his doctor, his superiors, and the state, but he will also behave just as tyrannically himself – though unconsciously.”

M.L. von Franz, Projection and Re-collection in Jungian Psychology

If an anti-authoritarian person has to deal with someone who shows even relatively slight manifestations of self-assertiveness or power, the image of the tyrant lying dormant in him will immediately attach itself to the other person. The projection has taken place. The projector is utterly convinced that he has to deal with a tyrant, a mistake of judgment of this kind can only be corrected with the greatest difficulty.

It is not only a person’s negative conscious qualities that are projected outward in this way, but in equal measure, his positive ones. The projection of the latter then brings about an excessive delusory, inappropriate evaluation and admiration of the object. It is possible for a person to infect others with his paranoid idea and for a sizeable group to take up the erroneous judgment, until another group finally sets the matter straight. Witch hunts as examples of negative projections or the veneration of a dictator as a saviour-hero as an example of positive projections, are witnesses to the existence of the phenomenon of collective contagion. Whole groups can project collectively, so that their mistake in judgment passes officially for the acceptable description of reality.

Freud: Mother Complex and Transference

Medusa – Arnold Böcklin

Freud believed that the true and false impressions received by a child in his earliest experiences of his parents and siblings, play a role in later projections. For example, a child who has experienced his father or mother in a specifically negative form, tends to project the same father or mother image onto older men or women he meets in later life.

A mother complex is an active component in everyone’s psyche, which includes one’s personal mother, contact with other women and by collective assumptions. A negative mother complex makes it impossible to have an unprejudiced experience of other people. Such a negative reaction lives on, stored up in the depths of the psyche, and is projected onto others at a suitable opportunity.

Another important phenomenon that Freud conceptualised is transference, where a person unconsciously projects the feelings for another person to an entirely different person. The difference from projection is that transference requires three people. For example, transferring feelings about one’s parents to one’s partner or mistrusting somebody who resembles an ex-spouse in manners, voice, or external appearance. This is a typical phenomenon in therapy, and one the analyst must be aware of, lest he engages in counter-transference, which may harm the relationship between analyst and analysand.

Carl Jung on Projection

Carl Jung

Many suffer from the fact that they do not take into consideration the manifestations of the unconscious in human beings. Carl Jung, the founder of analytical psychology, writes that:

“A man who is unconscious of himself acts in a blind, instinctive way and is in addition fooled by all the illusions that arise when he sees everything that he is not conscious of in himself coming to meet him from outside as projections upon his neighbour.”

Carl Jung, C.W. Vol. 13: Alchemical Studies

The same unconscious from which projections emanate, also strives, in certain phases of inner development, to correct them, through dreams or active imagination. Thus, in addition to the common sense judgment of the collectivity, there is an inner factor in the individual himself that tends to correct his image of reality from time to time.

“What Freud calls ‘the dream façade’ is the dream’s obscurity, and this is really only a projection of our own lack of understanding. We say that the dream has a false front only because we fail to see into it.”

Carl Jung, C.W. Vol. 16: Practice of Psychotherapy

Unless we are possessed of an unusual degree of self-awareness, we shall never see through our projections, but must always succumb to them. Because the mind, in its natural state, presupposes the existence of such projections.

Jung further elaborated the idea of projection in terms of the concept of the shadow and the anima and animus.

Jung: Shadow Projection

Hypnosis – Schneider

The shadow plays a crucial role in projection, both personally and collectively. I have talked about this concept more in-depth in another video.

As we repress the things we despise in ourselves and refuse to acknowledge them, they remain buried in the psyche and form the shadow, which is essentially what one has no wish to be. We then project like puppets pulled by the strings of the unconscious. Jung writes:

“The effect of projection is to isolate the subject from his environment, since instead of a real relation to it there is now only an illusory one. Projections change the world into the replica of one’s own unknown face. In the last analysis, therefore, they lead to an autoerotic or autistic condition in which one dreams a world whose reality remains forever unattainable… The more projections are thrust in between the subject and the environment, the harder it is for the ego to see through its illusions. A forty-five-year-old patient who had suffered from a compulsion neurosis since he was twenty and had become completely cut off from the world once said to me: “But I can never admit to myself that I’ve wasted the best twenty-five years of my life!” It is often tragic to see how blatantly a man bungles his own life and the lives of others yet remains totally incapable of seeing how much the whole tragedy originates in himself, and how he continually feeds it and keeps it going. Not consciously, of course—for consciously he is engaged in bewailing and cursing a faithless world that recedes further and further into the distance. Rather, it is an unconscious factor which spins the illusions that veil his world. And what is being spun is a cocoon, which in the end will completely envelop him.”

Carl Jung, C.W. Vol 9. Part II: Aion

With considerable effort, however, we can integrate the contents of the shadow in our personality, and become partly conscious of it. This is a lifelong process, and is indispensable for individuation (becoming who you are).

The reason it is so difficult to acquire insight into one’s own shadow is that inferior personality traits are mostly of an emotional nature. Emotions and affects are to a large extent relatively autonomous; they possess consciousness and can only with great difficulty be controlled. If it is not only one’s own shadow that stands behind the projections but also the contrasexual components of the personality, or perhaps still deeper archetypal contents, then insight into the projection in which these are involved is accompanied by almost insuperable difficulties.

Jung compares the personal shadow with the collective shadow:

“With a little self-criticism one can see through the shadow — so far as its nature is personal. But when it appears as an archetype, one encounters the same difficulties as with anima and animus. In other words, it is quite within the bounds of possibility for a man to recognise the relative evil of his nature, but it is a rare and shattering experience for him to gaze into the face of absolute evil.”

Carl Jung, C.W. Vol 9. Part II: Aion

Jung: Anima and Animus Projection

The Great Red Dragon and the Woman clothed with the Sun – William Blake

While the shadow is always of the same sex as the subject, when we talk of the opposite sex, the source of projections take the form of a contrasexual figure: the anima (the female psychological tendencies in man) and the animus (the male psychological tendencies in woman). I have done a video explaining these concepts as well.

Jung calls shadow integration the ‘apprentice-piece’, while anima or animus integration is the ‘master-piece’. This is in the context of individuation. Without a recognition of the shadow, it is impossible to integrate the anima or animus.

While the shadow represents first and foremost the personal unconscious, the anima and animus represent the collective unconscious. They symbolise the eternal images of man and woman, of Logos and Eros, which are projected onto real men and women.

A man can project his anima by overvaluing his masculine aspect in detriment to his feminine qualities, by partaking in pseudo-intellectual dialogues, and by treating woman simply as an object to fulfil his erotic fantasies, or to make stereotypical assumptions about patterns of behaviour such as “the way women are”.

There can also be an overattachment to one’s anima which is just as harmful, such as a man that is too effeminate and is preyed upon by women, or a man who lives regressively and seeks to return to his childhood under the protecting circle of the mother.

Perhaps the most common form of anima projection is being suddenly seized in a maddening and passionate love, like Eros, the Greek god of love shooting a love-igniting arrow. If those sensual pleasures fail the person who desires and wishes for them, he will suffer, pierced by the arrow of pain.

The projection of the animus of woman takes on a slightly different form. It takes on a hidden conviction about one’s beliefs, thoughts and assumptions. Such as wanting love but at the same time not believing anyone loves her. The father endows his daughter with unarguable true opinions, of “the right thing to do”, not including the daughter’s own opinion. This may lead a woman to flee into a dreamy fantasy land filled with all the desires and judgments of how things ought to be. Moreover, the animus personifies all the cold and destructive reflections that invade a woman which get her into a state where she even wishes death to others.

A mother who neglects her spiritual side may compensate by expecting an achievement from her son, such as having him pursue an ambitious academic career in order to satisfy her unconscious expectation.

Many people are brought back to themselves through the loving appreciation of another person. The teacher or the therapist who gives credit to his pupil or patient through the expectation of positive results can often nurture a blossoming of the other’s real personality and gifts. One day, though, this projection naturally falls away, and then it must be proven whether one can withdraw his projection and remain himself even without such help. This transition can be managed with the necessary wisdom, and awareness of one’s psychic reality.

Projection and Projectile

The Triumph of Galatea – Raphael

Whenever projection takes place, there is first of all a sender and a receiver. One of the oldest ways of symbolising projection is by means of projectiles, especially the magic arrow or shot that harms other people. It is generally believed that such a projectile is shot by a god, spirit, demon or some other mythological being, or by an evil person, and that it “hits” us, causing us to fall ill. The symbol of the arrow is a visual expression of being suddenly hit by a mood or an emotion that often strikes one like lightning out of a blue sky.

In late antiquity the suspicion had already arisen that certain gods might have something to do with the way in which emotions work in human beings, a view that was especially furthered by astrological speculations. Thus Saturn has something to do with a melancholy turn of mind, Mars with aggression and initiative, Venus and Cupid with love and sexuality – all states of mind or moods that strike people suddenly and overwhelmingly and for a time can overpower the conscious ego.

These phenomena are projections from the background of the psyche, autonomous inner images obeying no conscious intention, but coming and going at their own volition. Jung described these as archetypes, collectively-inherited forms that produce similar thoughts, mythological images, feelings, and emotions in human beings. These represent the spiritual contents of the unconscious, while the animal instinct, those impulses to action that are characteristic of the human species, represent the instinctual aspect of the unconscious.

Ultimately, however, it appears that projections always originate in the archetypes and in unconscious complexes.

An attack of aggressive hatred, for example, is felt by us as coming not from Mars but rather from an “evil adversary” who “deserves” to be hated (shadow projection), erotic passion not from Cupid but from a woman who arouses this passion in a man (anima projection).

The harmful words of human beings are like arrows. Deceitful people bend their tongue like a bow, and shoot a deadly arrow. Such activities as we learn from practical psychological experience are triggered by negative projections.

As soon as a person projects a bit of his shadow onto another human being, he is incited to this kind of rancorous speech. The words that hit the other person like projectiles symbolise the negativity directed against the other person by the one who is projecting.

When one becomes the target of another person’s negative projection, one often experiences that hatred almost physically as a projectile.

Active and passive projection

Narcissus – John William Waterhouse

Jung distinguishes between two kinds of projection: active and passive.

Active projection occurs when we thoughtlessly take for granted that the other person is like us and that what is valid for us is also valid for him, so that we feel justified in “improving” him, that is, in violating him psychologically. Jung writes:

“Just as we tend to assume that the world is as we see it, we naively suppose that people are as we imagine them to be… We still go on naively projecting our own psychology into our fellow human beings. In this way, everyone creates in himself a series of more or less imaginary relationships based essentially on projection.”

Carl Jung, C.W. Vol. 8: The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche

Passive projection includes an act of empathetic feeling, which serves to bring the object into an intimate relationship with the subject. In order to establish this relationship, the subject detaches a content – a feeling, for instance, lodges it in the object, thereby animating it, and in this way draws the object into the sphere of the subject. All compassion is grounded in this kind of unconscious identity with the others.

Passive projection—that is, unconscious empathy—is part of the psychological principle of Eros and forms the basis of all social relations; active projection, on the other hand, belongs to the realm of Logos, since it is concerned with an act of recognition or judgment, by means of which we make a distinction between ourselves and the—itself unknown—object. Both principles can in practice flow into and out of each other.

Introjection

Cry of the Masses – Josef Váchal

Passive projection is similar to what is known as introjection, the assimilation of object to subject. The difference is that introjection is not necessarily empathetic, it may also arise from a need of respect, power or superiority.

Introjection can be defined as unconsciously adopting the thoughts and behaviours of other people (instead of projecting them onto others). This is a natural process of a child’s development and relationship with his parents. One naturally introjects the qualities of those whom one looks up to, admires or worships. This may, however, include the bad aspects of a person, or lead to a superiority complex to the point of introjecting the qualities of God onto oneself.

Mystical participation

Lévy-Bruhl

The French ethnologist Lévy-Bruhl used the term participation mystique or “mystical participation”, the archaic identity of subject and object lives at the very bottom of our psyche.

We are instinctively tied to symbols that precedes all intellectualism. Our ancestors were much more governed by their unconscious instincts and participation in nature and the objects surrounding them. The inner world was merged with the external world. It is only a recent phenomenon that our world seems to be cleansed of all superstitious and irrational elements. However, this is not so for the inner world, which does not discriminate between subject and object. Jung writes:

“[O]nly certain functions and areas have outgrown the primary mystic identity with the object. Primitive man has a minimum of self-awareness combined with a maximum of attachment to the object; hence the object can exercise a direct magical compulsion upon him… Self-awareness gradually developed out of this initial state of identity and went hand in hand with the differentiation of subject and object… But as everyone knows, our self-awareness is still a long way behind our actual knowledge.”

Carl Jung, C.W. Vol. 8: The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche

Mystical participation is closely related to projection, because the projected mythological images are present in objects, people and situations.

Thought forms, universally understandable gestures, and many attitudes follow a pattern that was established long before man developed a reflective consciousness. It is conceivable that the early origins of man’s capacity to reflect come from the painful consequences of violent emotional clashes. For example, a bushman who in a moment of anger and disappointment at his failure to catch any fish, strangles his much beloved only son, and is then seized with immense regret as he holds the little dead body in his arms.

Modern man knows more about mythological symbolism than did any generation before our own, they have become the object of conscious reflection. Primitive man did not reflect upon their symbols, they lived them and were unconsciously animated by their meaning.

Unconscious contents, however, cannot be integrated into the subject into their entirety. The process is like that of peeling an onion – one or more layers of an unconscious complex can, indeed, be integrated by the conscious personality but not the core itself.

In the core we find the archetypes of the collective unconscious, which create projections against our will, because such contents cannot be integrated by ego-consciousness. If one wants to understand these projections and prevent their renewal, the content must be recognised as psychically real, though not as a part of the subject but rather as an autonomous power. If we could see through all our projections down to the last traces, our personality would be extended to cosmic dimensions.

Jung once compared the ego to a man who sails out in his boat (the philosophical or religious ideas behind his conscious view of the world) onto the sea of the unconscious to go fishing. He must take care not to haul more fish (that is, more unconscious contents) from the sea into his boat than the boat can carry, or it will sink. This explains why people with weak egos often defend themselves so desperately against any and every insight into their negative projections – they cannot bear the weight, the moral pressure, that results from such insight.

Psychological Projection as Inner Gold

Jungian analyst Robert A. Johnson

“I learn so much from watching, and one of the things I observe most carefully is the exchange of inner, alchemical gold. Inner gold is the highest value in the human psyche. It is our soul, the Self, the innermost part of our being.”

Robert A. Johnson, Inner Gold: Understanding Psychological Projection

In his book Inner Gold: Understanding Psychological Projection, Jungian analyst Robert A. Johnson presents psychological projection as giving up our “inner gold” to those whom we idealise or are attracted to. He writes:

“When we awaken to a new possibility in our lives, we often see it first in another person. A part of us that has been hidden is about to emerge, but it doesn’t go in a straight line from our unconscious to becoming conscious. It travels by way of an intermediary, a host. We project our gold onto someone, and suddenly we’re consumed with that person. The first inkling of this is when the other person appears to be so luminous that he (or she) glows in the dark. That’s a sure sign that something is changing in us and we are projecting our gold onto the other person.”

Robert A. Johnson, Inner Gold: Understanding Psychological Projection

By observing the things we attribute to the other person, we see our own depth and meaning. Our gold goes first from us to them, and eventually it will come back to us. Projecting our inner gold offers us the best chance for an advance in consciousness. And we must learn the arduous task of “taking back” this gold as we move through life’s journey.

The work of the alchemists was to transmute base metals into gold. There were charlatans only concerned with material possession. However, for the true alchemists, gold is the metaphor for the spiritual and psychological task of inner transformation.

When we see that we have given our spiritual gold to someone to hold for us, there are several ways we might respond. We could go to him or her and say, “The meaning of my life has suddenly appeared in the glow in your eyes. May I tell you about it?” This is another way of saying, “I have given you my inner gold. Will you carry it for me for a while?”

We cling to people who are the repositories of our gold and won’t let them loose. If this person were to you leave you, and you can’t function properly alone – it probably means that he or she has taken your gold.

The exchange of gold is a mysterious process. It is our gold, but it’s too heavy for us, so we need someone else to carry it for a time. That person becomes synonymous with meaning. A smile can raise us to heavenly heights, a frown will hurl us to hellish depths, so great is the power of meaning.

One reason we hesitate to carry our own gold is that it is dangerously close to God. Our gold has Godlike characteristics, and it is difficult to bear the weight of it. This is the original meaning of the terms godfather and godmother. That person is the carrier of Godlike qualities for you, someone who carries the subtle part of your life—a parent in an interior, Godlike way.

Robert tells the story of one of his patients who would compliment him every time they saw each other. Robert would tell him, all these qualities are your values. You need to drape it around my neck for a while, but you’re going to take it back eventually. He’d tell Robert how valuable he was to him, how lucky he was to have him as a therapist. He was talking about his inner gold and was desperate for someone to take it off his shoulders, for it was too heavy for him. This went on for almost five years. Robert writes:

“Then, one day, he said, “I want my gold back.” I had noticed that he was getting restless, so I agreed. “Things are changing”, I said. “Let’s do a ceremony to put the gold back in your pocket.” I conjured up a small piece of gold, the size of a pea, and a few days later we had the ceremony. He held the kernel of gold, shaking, suddenly more aware of what he had been doing. Then he put it in my hands and said, anxiously, “Suppose you don’t give it back?” … I said, “This is your gold, and it belongs only in your pocket. I am honoured that you would allow me to hold it for you all these years. But it’s yours, and it needs to go back to you.” … The next day, he had his gold all over me again. He couldn’t hold it and wanted me to take it back. The exchange of gold is not entirely a voluntary matter. Sometimes it takes a few round trips. We traded the gold back and forth several more times until one day he could withstand it. Since then, I haven’t heard any more about him wanting it back.”

Robert A. Johnson, Inner Gold: Understanding Psychological Projection

When the exchange of gold proceeds well, we mature and eventually become strong enough to ask for our gold back. Carrying someone’s gold is a fine art and a high responsibility. If you are the recipient of someone’s gold, hold it carefully and be prepared to give it back within a microsecond’s notice. Unfortunately, there are people who collect inner gold and refuse to give it back. It’s a kind of murder.

It is only after you get your gold back that you can see the gold of the other person. When the time is right, when you are ready to bear the weight, you must get your gold back.

“If it has an impact, it means there is a war inside me. You set it off, but what you set off is my business. Anything that can burn in a person should burn. Only the things that are fireproof are worth keeping. If you can hurt my feelings, they are better off hurt, because it’s an error in me.”

Robert A. Johnson, Inner Gold: Understanding Psychological Projection

------------------------------------------

Source

https://eternalisedofficial.com/2022/06/09/psychological-projection/